Compare

Makunike.com AI Twin vs CaseNotes vs WhatsApp platforms

The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.

Clear · Up to 3 at a time

In common

  • Shared stack: none in common
  • Both kinds of work: AI
  • Order: WhatsApp platforms (2018 – 2022) → CaseNotes (Feb 2026 – present) → Makunike.com AI Twin (Oct 2026)

Swipe sideways to compare ›

Makunike.com AI Twin ›

This website: a portfolio you can interview by phone call or chat

CaseNotes ›

South African legal research, e-discovery and learning, powered by AI

WhatsApp platforms ›

Altur, Harambee and eButler on the WhatsApp Business API

At a glance

Role
Designer & Engineer
When
Oct 2026
Length
1 mo
Status
Live
Type
AI, Web
Role
Founder / Lead Engineer
When
Feb 2026 – present
Length
9 mo so far
Status
Live
Type
AI, Web, Mobile
Role
Lead engineer, Mmogo Media
When
2018 – 2022
Length
4 yr
Status
Delivered
Type
Platform, AI

The problem

Portfolios are static, but hiring conversations aren't. A recruiter wants to know whether I've shipped mobile apps, a hiring manager wants a production story in STAR form, and a sourcing agent wants structured answers it can compare. A PDF CV can't do any of that.
South African legal information is scattered across portals with limited keyword search, while international e-discovery platforms are often priced beyond the local market.
A WhatsApp-based job platform (Altur), Harambee Youth Accelerator's move from a mobisite to WhatsApp, and eButler's WhatsApp ordering with payments through Flash.

What was built

A digital version of me that holds a real interview by phone-style voice call or text, grounded only in material I curated. It changes what's on screen as it answers, logs what it can't answer so I can teach it, records and QA-scores every call, and is reachable by other AI agents over MCP and A2A.
An integrated research, e-discovery and learning platform: hybrid semantic search across more than 10,000 judgments, a precedent citation graph, structured document extraction, AI-assisted discovery and stateful research workflows.
—

Stack

  • Next.js 15
  • React 19
  • Tailwind CSS v4
  • GPT-6.1 (Azure, Responses API)
  • gpt-realtime-2.1
  • WebRTC
  • text-embedding-3-small
  • Supabase pgvector
  • TypeSafe Jev
  • MCP
  • A2A
  • Azure Blob
  • LangSmith
  • Vercel
  • Next.js
  • FastAPI
  • PostgreSQL
  • pgvector
  • Neo4j
  • Redis/ARQ
  • Azure OpenAI
  • LangChain
  • LangGraph
  • Python
  • Django
  • WhatsApp Business API
  • Infobip
  • Twilio

Highlights

  • Generative UI: the model calls typed navigate and show_panel tools, streamed to the browser as NDJSON events
  • Phone-call voice on gpt-realtime-2.1 over WebRTC, with every call recorded, transcribed and QA-scored
  • TypeSafe Jev in ten places: routing, tool selection, interview mode, guards, lead scoring, grounding, triage, FAQ review, agent vetting and call QA
  • Self-improving RAG: weak or ungrounded answers land in a ranked CMS inbox and become FAQs
  • MCP and A2A servers with request vetting and rate limits for agent-to-agent interviews
  • Five-stage Graph RAG pipeline in LangGraph
  • Hybrid pgvector and Neo4j retrieval, and a TAR active-learning loop
  • Human-in-the-loop tool-calling chat with PostgreSQL checkpoints
  • MCP server for case search and drafting
  • Conversational journeys on the WhatsApp Business API
  • Payments via Flash, Paystack and MTN MoMo

Infrastructure choices

  • Vercel serverless (Next.js route handlers)
  • Azure OpenAI
  • Supabase Postgres + pgvector (HNSW)
  • TypeSafe Jev
  • Azure Blob Storage
  • pgvector + Neo4j
  • Redis / ARQ workers
  • LangGraph with PostgreSQL checkpoints
—

Outcome

The twin never invents a fact about my career: when it doesn't know, it says so and I'm notified. Intent-matched navigation fires within about a second, before the first answer token. Every call is recorded, transcribed and scored so review starts with the calls that need it, and one knowledge base serves text, voice, MCP and A2A.
An integrated research and review platform grounded in more than 10,000 judgments, with a structured learning bank of 1,624 rubric-scored questions. The architecture supports resumable jobs, traceable sources and human review.
—