Compare

Ventaw vs ParcelNow vs Multichoice installer payments

The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.

Clear · Up to 3 at a time

In common

  • Shared stack: none in common
  • Both kinds of work: Platform

Swipe sideways to compare ›

Ventaw ›

Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads

ParcelNow ›

On-demand parcel delivery with real-time tracking

Multichoice installer payments ›

R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months

At a glance

Role
Founder / Lead Engineer
When
In progress
Length
—
Status
In progress
Type
Platform, Web
Role
Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
When
2025 – 2026
Length
1 yr
Status
Delivered
Type
Web, Platform
Role
Integration engineer
When
Delivered
Length
—
Status
Delivered
Type
Platform

The problem

Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
Customer and operations dashboards with backend services for parcel lifecycles, tracking events and notifications, built for high-throughput transactional workflows.
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.

What was built

—
—
—

Stack

  • Next.js
  • FastAPI
  • Docker
  • Next.js
  • FastAPI
  • PostgreSQL
  • Redis
  • Docker
  • Payments integration

Highlights

  • Next.js management interface
  • FastAPI orchestration APIs
  • Next.js dashboards over FastAPI services
  • Live delivery updates through logistics and messaging integrations
  • Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months

Infrastructure choices

—
  • Docker-based development and deployment standards
—

Outcome

—
—
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.