Compare

ParcelNow vs Multichoice installer payments vs OrderEase

The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.

Clear · Up to 3 at a time

In common

  • Shared stack: none in common
  • Both kinds of work: Platform
  • Order: ParcelNow (2025 – 2026) → OrderEase (2025 – 2026)

Swipe sideways to compare ›

ParcelNow ›

On-demand parcel delivery with real-time tracking

Multichoice installer payments ›

R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months

OrderEase ›

Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers

At a glance

Role
Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
When
2025 – 2026
Length
1 yr
Status
Delivered
Type
Web, Platform
Role
Integration engineer
When
Delivered
Length
—
Status
Delivered
Type
Platform
Role
Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
When
2025 – 2026
Length
1 yr
Status
Live
Type
Web, Platform

The problem

Customer and operations dashboards with backend services for parcel lifecycles, tracking events and notifications, built for high-throughput transactional workflows.
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.

What was built

—
—
—

Stack

  • Next.js
  • FastAPI
  • PostgreSQL
  • Redis
  • Docker
  • Payments integration
  • Next.js
  • FastAPI
  • PostgreSQL
  • Redis

Highlights

  • Next.js dashboards over FastAPI services
  • Live delivery updates through logistics and messaging integrations
  • Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
  • Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
  • FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment

Infrastructure choices

  • Docker-based development and deployment standards
—
—

Outcome

—
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—