Compare
OrderEase vs Ventaw vs Multichoice installer payments
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
Swipe sideways to compare ›
OrderEase ›
Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
At a glance
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
The problem
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
What was built
—
—
—
Stack
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
- Payments integration
Highlights
- Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
- FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
Infrastructure choices
—
—
—
Outcome
—
—
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.