Compare
OrderEase vs Multichoice installer payments vs Ventaw
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
Swipe sideways to compare ›
OrderEase ›
Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
At a glance
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
The problem
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
What was built
—
—
—
Stack
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Payments integration
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
Highlights
- Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
- FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
Infrastructure choices
—
—
—
Outcome
—
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—