Compare
OrderEase vs Multichoice installer payments vs ParcelNow
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
- Order: OrderEase (2025 – 2026) → ParcelNow (2025 – 2026)
Swipe sideways to compare ›
OrderEase ›
Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
ParcelNow ›
On-demand parcel delivery with real-time tracking
At a glance
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Web, Platform
The problem
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Customer and operations dashboards with backend services for parcel lifecycles, tracking events and notifications, built for high-throughput transactional workflows.
What was built
—
—
—
Stack
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Payments integration
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Docker
Highlights
- Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
- FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- Next.js dashboards over FastAPI services
- Live delivery updates through logistics and messaging integrations
Infrastructure choices
—
—
- Docker-based development and deployment standards
Outcome
—
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—