Compare
Multichoice installer payments vs Ventaw vs ParcelNow
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
Swipe sideways to compare ›
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
ParcelNow ›
On-demand parcel delivery with real-time tracking
At a glance
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Web, Platform
The problem
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
Customer and operations dashboards with backend services for parcel lifecycles, tracking events and notifications, built for high-throughput transactional workflows.
What was built
—
—
—
Stack
- Payments integration
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Docker
Highlights
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
- Next.js dashboards over FastAPI services
- Live delivery updates through logistics and messaging integrations
Infrastructure choices
—
—
- Docker-based development and deployment standards
Outcome
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—
—