Compare
Multichoice installer payments vs Ventaw vs OrderEase
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
Swipe sideways to compare ›
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
OrderEase ›
Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers
At a glance
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
The problem
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.
What was built
—
—
—
Stack
- Payments integration
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
Highlights
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
- Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
- FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment
Infrastructure choices
—
—
—
Outcome
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—
—