Compare
Multichoice installer payments vs Ventaw vs Joel Transport
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
- Both kinds of work: Platform
Swipe sideways to compare ›
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
Joel Transport ›
Online booking platform on AWS
At a glance
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
- Role
- Lead Engineer
- When
- Dec 2022 – May 2023
- Length
- 6 mo
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
The problem
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
Centralised the customer journey and operational data, reduced manual hand-offs and set up a documented AWS foundation.
What was built
—
—
Led architecture and hands-on engineering for an online booking platform: Python APIs and the AWS deployment architecture, integrated with Paystack, Sage Accounting, Zoho Bigin and Zoho SalesIQ.
Stack
- Payments integration
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
- Python
- AWS
- Paystack
- Sage
- Zoho
Highlights
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
- Python APIs and AWS deployment architecture
- Paystack, Sage Accounting, Zoho Bigin and Zoho SalesIQ integrations
Infrastructure choices
—
—
- AWS
Outcome
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—
Centralised the customer journey and key operational data, reduced manual hand-offs and established a documented AWS foundation for future development.