Compare
Multichoice installer payments vs CV Coach vs Ventaw
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: none in common
Swipe sideways to compare ›
Multichoice installer payments ›
R5M+ paid to installers in the first six months
CV Coach ›
AI CV analysis, job matching and tailored applications
Ventaw ›
Secure, isolated environments for developer workloads
At a glance
- Role
- Integration engineer
- When
- Delivered
- Length
- —
- Status
- Delivered
- Type
- Platform
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- 2025 – present
- Length
- 1 yr 9 mo so far
- Status
- MVP
- Type
- AI, Web
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- In progress
- Length
- —
- Status
- In progress
- Type
- Platform, Web
The problem
Integrated the installer management system into Multichoice's payment process so installers are paid accurately and on time.
A Chrome extension captures job ads; a LangGraph workflow parses the CV and the ad, scores the match and drafts tailored cover letters and CV revisions.
Environment provisioning, session management and resource monitoring, designed for security, multi-tenancy and concurrent workloads.
What was built
—
A Chrome extension captures advertisements, stores them in PostgreSQL and queues analysis. The platform compares a CV with a job description, produces a structured match score and generates tailored cover letters and CV revisions.
—
Stack
- Payments integration
- FastAPI
- Next.js
- Supabase
- LangGraph
- LangChain
- Celery
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- Docker
Highlights
- Processed over R5 million in installer payments within six months
- LangGraph workflow with custom tools to parse, compare evidence and score the match
- Asynchronous analysis pipeline
- Next.js management interface
- FastAPI orchestration APIs
Infrastructure choices
—
—
—
Outcome
Over R5 million in installer payments processed within six months.
—
—