Compare
Makunike.com AI Twin vs CV Coach vs OrderEase
The problem, what was built, the stack and the outcome, next to each other.
Clear · Up to 3 at a time
In common
- Shared stack: Next.js
- Both kinds of work: Web
- Order: CV Coach (2025 – present) → OrderEase (2025 – 2026) → Makunike.com AI Twin (Oct 2026)
Swipe sideways to compare ›
Makunike.com AI Twin ›
This website: a portfolio you can interview by phone call or chat
CV Coach ›
AI CV analysis, job matching and tailored applications
OrderEase ›
Branded online ordering for restaurants and retailers
At a glance
- Role
- Designer & Engineer
- When
- Oct 2026
- Length
- 1 mo
- Status
- Live
- Type
- AI, Web
- Role
- Founder / Lead Engineer
- When
- 2025 – present
- Length
- 1 yr 9 mo so far
- Status
- MVP
- Type
- AI, Web
- Role
- Technical lead, Smart Kitchen Co
- When
- 2025 – 2026
- Length
- 1 yr
- Status
- Live
- Type
- Web, Platform
The problem
Portfolios are static, but hiring conversations aren't. A recruiter wants to know whether I've shipped mobile apps, a hiring manager wants a production story in STAR form, and a sourcing agent wants structured answers it can compare. A PDF CV can't do any of that.
A Chrome extension captures job ads; a LangGraph workflow parses the CV and the ad, scores the match and drafts tailored cover letters and CV revisions.
Direct ordering and order management: menus, orders, payments and fulfilment, with automated order intake and status updates that cut merchants' operational overhead.
What was built
A digital version of me that holds a real interview by phone-style voice call or text, grounded only in material I curated. It changes what's on screen as it answers, logs what it can't answer so I can teach it, records and QA-scores every call, and is reachable by other AI agents over MCP and A2A.
A Chrome extension captures advertisements, stores them in PostgreSQL and queues analysis. The platform compares a CV with a job description, produces a structured match score and generates tailored cover letters and CV revisions.
—
Stack
- Next.js 15
- React 19
- Tailwind CSS v4
- GPT-6.1 (Azure, Responses API)
- gpt-realtime-2.1
- WebRTC
- text-embedding-3-small
- Supabase pgvector
- TypeSafe Jev
- MCP
- A2A
- Azure Blob
- LangSmith
- Vercel
- FastAPI
- Next.js
- Supabase
- LangGraph
- LangChain
- Celery
- Next.js
- FastAPI
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
Highlights
- Generative UI: the model calls typed navigate and show_panel tools, streamed to the browser as NDJSON events
- Phone-call voice on gpt-realtime-2.1 over WebRTC, with every call recorded, transcribed and QA-scored
- TypeSafe Jev in ten places: routing, tool selection, interview mode, guards, lead scoring, grounding, triage, FAQ review, agent vetting and call QA
- Self-improving RAG: weak or ungrounded answers land in a ranked CMS inbox and become FAQs
- MCP and A2A servers with request vetting and rate limits for agent-to-agent interviews
- LangGraph workflow with custom tools to parse, compare evidence and score the match
- Asynchronous analysis pipeline
- Fast, responsive ordering on Next.js
- FastAPI services for menus, orders, payments and fulfilment
Infrastructure choices
- Vercel serverless (Next.js route handlers)
- Azure OpenAI
- Supabase Postgres + pgvector (HNSW)
- TypeSafe Jev
- Azure Blob Storage
—
—
Outcome
The twin never invents a fact about my career: when it doesn't know, it says so and I'm notified. Intent-matched navigation fires within about a second, before the first answer token. Every call is recorded, transcribed and scored so review starts with the calls that need it, and one knowledge base serves text, voice, MCP and A2A.
—
—